KUHN Surname Meaning and Family History

The Kuhn surname originated as a nickname or descriptive name for someone who was bold or keen; descendant of KUHN, a pet form of Kunrat, German form of Conrad, meaning bold, counsel. Surname Origin:  German Alternate Surname Spellings:  KUHNE, KUEHN, KUHNS, KIHN, COON, COONS, COEN, COONE, KUNZ, KUNTZ, KUHNE, KOHN, KUEHNE, KÃÅ"HN,  KÃÅ"HNE Famous People With the KUHN  Surname Thomas Kuhn - American historian and physicist; famous for  his 1962 book called The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsFriedrich Adalbert Maximilian Kuhn - German botanistOskar Kuhn - German paleontologistRichard Kuhn -  Austrian biochemist, winner of the 1938 Nobel Prize in ChemistryW. Langdon Kihn -  American painter and illustrator Where Is the KUHN Surname Most Common? According to surname distribution from Forebears, the Kuhn  surname is most common in Germany, ranking as the countrys 56th most common surname. It is also fairly common in Switzerland, where it is the 74th most common last name.  WorldNames PublicProfiler  data indicates the Kuhn surname is especially common in southwestern German, particularly the state of Saarland. It is also common in Zurich, Ostschweiz and Nordwestschweiz, Switzerland, as well as in Alsace, France. Surname maps from Verwandt.de indicate the  Kuhn surname is most common in southwestern Germany, especially in the counties or cities of Munich, Neunkirchen, Stadtverband Saarbrucken, Ostalbkreis, Wurzburg, Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Esslingen and Offenbach. Genealogy Resources for the Surname KUHN Meanings of Common German SurnamesUncover the meaning of your German last name with this free guide to the meanings and origins of common German surnames. Kuhn  Family Crest - Its Not What You ThinkContrary to what you may hear, there is no such thing as a Kuhn  family crest or coat of arms for the Kuhn surname.  Coats of arms are granted to individuals, not families, and may rightfully be used only by the uninterrupted male line descendants of the person to whom the coat of arms was originally granted. Coon DNA Surname ProjectIndividuals with the Coon surname and variations such as Kuhn, Kuehne, Koone, Kohn, Koon, Kuhne, Kuhns, Coontz, and Kuntz, plus dozens of others, have joined together to combine genealogy research with Y-DNA testing to help determine common ancestry. KUHN  Family Genealogy ForumThis free message board is focused on the descendants of Kuhn  ancestors around the world. Search or browse the archives for your Kuhn ancestors, or join the group and post your own Kuhn family query. FamilySearch - KUHN  GenealogyExplore over 2.8  million results from digitized  historical records and lineage-linked family trees related to the Kuhn surname on this free website hosted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. KUHN  Surname Mailing ListFree mailing list for researchers of the Kuhn surname and its variations includes subscription details and a searchable archives of past messages. DistantCousin.com - KUHN  Genealogy Family HistoryExplore free databases and genealogy links for the last name Kuhn. GeneaNet - Kuhn  RecordsGeneaNet includes archival records, family trees, and other resources for individuals with the Kuhn  surname, with a concentration on records and families from France and other European countries. The Kuhn  Genealogy and Family Tree PageBrowse genealogy records and links to genealogical and historical records for individuals with the Kuhn  surname from the website of Genealogy Today. References: Surname Meanings & Origins Cottle, Basil.  Penguin Dictionary of Surnames. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1967.Dorward, David.  Scottish Surnames. Collins Celtic (Pocket edition), 1998.Fucilla, Joseph.  Our Italian Surnames. Genealogical Publishing Company, 2003.Hanks, Patrick and Flavia Hodges.  A Dictionary of Surnames. Oxford University Press, 1989.Hanks, Patrick.  Dictionary of American Family Names. Oxford University Press, 2003.Reaney, P.H.  A Dictionary of English Surnames. Oxford University Press, 1997.Smith, Elsdon C.  American Surnames. Genealogical Publishing Company, 1997.

The Last Day of a Condemned Man by Victor Hugo and In Cold...

One debate that is surrounded by the death penalty is the humanity of it. Can we consider making someone wait for months, and even more realistically years, to be put to death? In the books The Last Day of a Condemned Man and In Cold Blood, both narrators tell the tale of impending death. While The Last Day of a Condemned Man is told in a first person view, In Cold Blood is told from a third person. Although from different views, each tells the trials and tribulations of approaching the death penalty. The Last Day of a Condemned Man wrote by Victor Hugo, is told by a man who is waiting on death row for a crime never established. Based on 1829 France and the reign of terror, from the beginning of the novel to the end you see the†¦show more content†¦That quote gives you a real sense of the suffering one feels while they are on death row. Although Capote does not use the same metaphor in In Cold Blood, illness is also a part of the novel. Capote uses mental heath as a sta tement when it came to Perry. Although Capote never comes right out and says it, both him and Perry seem to have a little bit of mental illness. While Perry showed signs of mental illness before the murders, his incarceration also seems to intensify it. Perry was diagnosed with schizophrenia and extreme paranoia. With death constantly looming over his head, the paranoid thoughts he suffered from continued and became more prevalent. Since 1983, over 60 people with mental illness or retardation have been executed in the United States. It is also known that mental illness increases thirty percent when in incarceration. In both novels the criminals were put to death in inhumane ways. In The Last Day of a Condemned Man, the man is put to death by the guillotine, and in In Cold Blood, hanging killed both Perry and Dick. While the guillotine was a new, and more accurate way of killing than the axe, it still did not always work. Also, the beheading was done out in the square in fron t of all to see. This humiliating experience is the last thing the convicted would see. Also, many times the convicted would be killed in batches and would be forced to watch the others in front of them be killed. Hanging, although used for a

The Greatest Ruler of Rome free essay sample

Despite the great contributions and peace he brought to Rome, his climb up the ladder for power was paved with destruction and violence. Octavian was ruthless in killing anyone he supposed was a threat to his power. He had no regard for any Roman laws and carried out his actions with the intention of building his own glory. It is easy to establish that Octavians rise to power was filled with unethical decisions. Before ying, Caesar adopted his grandnephew Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus in his will, making him Caesars principal heir. Octavian began winning over the support of many Roman citizens by offers of money. In 43, Octavian had the ambitions of becoming Consul, which was opposed by the Senate considering he was only nineteen years old. At this point, Octavian marched on Rome at the head of eight legions leaving the Senate with no choice but to give into Octavians command. We will write a custom essay sample on The Greatest Ruler of Rome or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page From the start, Octavian began bribing the Roman citizens with riches for their support and skipped his way to the top of the cursus honorum by use of force. It is clear that Octavian had no reverence for the Roman laws, and did not consider ethics when carrying out his actions. In an attempt to remove all threats to his power, Octavian commanded that Caesars assassins be condemned and outlawed along with Sextus Pompey, the son of Caesars former rival Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus. Octavian unnecessarily orders the death of three humans who no longer live in Rome and have not expressed any intention of removing Octavian of his power. He has allowed his greed for power to lead him in carrying out unethical actions. Moreover, in 43 Octavian along wit Lepidus and Antony established the Second Triumvirate, essentially making them dictators. They made laws without any reference to the senate or the people, exercised all orders without appeal, and nominated all magistrates with no regard to elections. The Triumvirate broke several important Roman laws, giving all three members unchecked power. In order to maintain an army of sixty legions, they enacted confiscations and proscriptions as Sulla had done before. The Second Triumvirate surpassed the precedent that Sulla set and proscribed as many as 300 senators and 2,000 equites. The creation of the Second Triumvirate is extremely ironic and shows that Octavian is willing to do anything in order to maintain his power. He initially despised Antony and wanted to remove Antony from Rome, but was willing to Join forces in order accomplish his own personal glory and gain unopposed power. After defeating Brutus and Cassius, those responsible for the assassination of Caesar, the Triumvirate carried out even more proscriptions and confiscations in order to meet the needs of their veterans. Italy was set into turmoil and plagued with injustices for years. During Octavians conquest in eliminating Sextus Pompey, Octavian renewed the Triumvirate with Antony and humiliated Lepidus by requiring him to live in exile. This represents Octavians ambitious mission in attaining absolute power even if it meant deception and betrayal. Octavian takes the final step towards becoming the sole ruler of Rome between 36 and 30 as he eliminates Antony. He exposes Antonys privacy by illegally seizing Antonys will and publicizing its contents. Before going to war with Antony and seizing Alexandria, Octavian deprives the Romans of their freedom by forcing them to pledge their loyalty. From 30 onwards, Octavian essentially served as Romes sole uler. He began to build the Roman empire and the destruction he enacted prior to this momentous point in his life was diminished. Under the First Settlement, Octavian was renamed Augustus and acknowledged Agrippa as a partner to the consulship. At the moment, it seemed to contemporary Romans that the Republic was restored, however historians have acknowledged that Romes rule remained authoritarian. It can be clearly understood that Augustuss rise to power was coated with injustice and immorality, however it can be Justified by the greatness that was brought to Rome in the following decades. Although he gave power back to the Senate and declared himself a Princep rather than an Imperator, Rome was not truly Republican since Augustus continued to hold the consulship year after year. Augustus resigned the consulship when he realized that he could retain its authority without having the title and took further power without office when he had himself renewed as a tribune annually. With his retainment of power but lack of title, Augustus successfully removed himself of being a dictator by name. Until his death, Augustus expanded the Roman empire more extensively than Pompey and Caesar and brought great wealth nd peace to Rome. The senate regained its former status and Rome was transformed as a city. Temples were restored, the Forum was rebuilt, and more importantly aqueducts were constructed to provide clean water to Roman citizens. Augustuss legacy was a great one; he died with the respect of the Roman people and ne was credited tor completely transtorming the Roman empire, making it greater than it had ever been. Augustuss unethical acts in his rise to power were Justified by the supreme condition he left Rome in. He laid the foundations for the Roman regime that would last at least a thousand years after his death.

Larkin Is Misogynist Essay Sample free essay sample

Larkin is a woman hater who hates matrimony and kids. Discuss how far you agree. I agree with this statement to some extend but non to the full. I think Larkin can come across in these ways nevertheless to set a definite label on him would be an premise. Besides I think that by stating he hates kids and matrimony is excessively much of a strong statement and possibly he personally neer take to make these peculiar things in life or couldn’t understand them. Larkin comes across as a woman hater from the manner he presents adult females as merely objects for the intent of work forces. For illustration in the verse form ‘For Sidney Bechet’ he writes â€Å"sporting-house misss like circus Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelams ( priced far above rubies ) † which is possibly mentioning to wild prostitute adult females who have been tamed. from the manner he uses carnal imagination with the simile of a circus tiger. We will write a custom essay sample on Larkin Is Misogynist Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The really fact he has made this nexus with animate beings could be interpreted as derogatory towards adult females and in many ways an abuse. Furthermore the manner in which these work forces are â€Å"grouping round their chairs† gives the feeling these work forces are sitting and perversely watching and taking these adult females for their sexual pleasance which undermines adult females and objectifies them. Larkin may besides be seen as exteriorizing adult females in another verse form â€Å"Wild Oats† where he writes â€Å"in my billfold are still two catchs of bosomy rose with fur baseball mitts on. † The manner he uses â€Å"bosomy† as an adjectival referring to the aesthetic qualities of her chests alternatively of any echt compliment on her personality so this remark could be seen as disrespectful. In add-on he writes â€Å"with fur baseball mitts on† which gives a sexual semblance of this adult female. as fur baseball mitts and big chests are a provocative combination and the fact he has this image in his billfold seams instead perverse. The fact that the rubric of the verse form itself can be used as a euphemism for sex high spots the thought that possibly he merely sees adult females as a agency for sex. On the other manus. others would reason that the really fact he shows this type of sexual involvement in adult females proves that he is non misogami st seeing as he shows involvement and a lecherousness for them. Although it may look derogatory he is non showing any hatred towards these adult females but merely appreciating their aesthetic values. The consequence this may hold could do adult females to hold a hatred towards Larkin but by no agency is he hateful towards adult females. For illustration in Wild Oats besides the character of â€Å"bosomy rose† he is composing about a echt relationship with her friend. He writes how he â€Å"met beautiful twice† this adjectival in many ways compensates for the risque adjective of â€Å"bosomy† and shows how he can be respectful of adult females. It besides could be a manner of doing a point of how the attractive force to the friend. ( regardless of the â€Å"specs† ) was more meaningful than the surface qualities of the â€Å"bosomy rose† . hence through this character he shows us how he did get gentlemanly traits and the capableness of love for a adult female. He writes how it lasted for â€Å"seven years† demoing that he had dedication to this love and how he â€Å"gave a ten-guinea ring† which is a symbol of committedness and a loving gesture. So overall I think one can infer from the Poem and from the fact he had assorted relationships with adult females in his priv ate life that he is capable of love for adult females and therefore non a woman hater. Frolicing uses the subject of matrimony to a great extent in his verse forms and chiefly in negative manner which gives the reader a strong sense he opposes the thought of matrimony. For case in â€Å"the Whitsun Weddings† the character he writes from clearly has an inexplicable position on nuptialss and a confusion towards the tradition. As he views from the window of his train he Judgess these adult females. who are portion of the nuptials. in a negative visible radiation when he writes â€Å"girls in lampoons of manner. heels and veils† about doing a jeer of their pathetic outfits for the juncture. He so writes how this â€Å"marked off the misss unreally† which could intend how it made them look inexpensive and bogus. Larkin makes it clear in assorted other verse forms such as â€Å"here† that he has a hatred for consumerism and hence from the description of these bogus stuffs we are cognizant that this is a negative thing. He describes the frocks and the cheep cloths of â€Å"nylon† and forge colorss â€Å"lemons mauves and olives† and from the manner he uses nutrients can be interpreted to hold a important symbolic significance in the sense that these organic nutrients become out of day of the month in clip. which could be proposing he has a acrimonious sentiment on matrimony that it will shortly go dull over clip and neer last. In the penultimate stanza he writes how â€Å"none idea of the others they would neer run into or how their lives would all incorporate this hour† he truly expresses Larkin’s position on matrimony and committ edness. as he appears to experience that matrimony limits opportunities and options it besides raises the inquiry as to whether he feared matrimony and the alteration it could hold on his life and freedom. This would propose that every bit opposed to detesting matrimony Larkin simply feared it. The line â€Å" Sun destroys the involvement of what’s go oning in the shade† metaphorically could be interpreted to demo how fabulous show of a nuptials can â€Å"destroy† or deflect what happened out of position from the populace like the emphasis. differences and world of mistakes in the relationship. The imagination of the Sun besides creates a bright beautiful nexus with nuptialss that people see on the surface juxtaposed with the world of obtuseness as the old ages go on. In the verse form â€Å"Self’s the Man† he portrays Man to be more superior to adult females. His sentiment of love’s initial exhilaration contrasted with the obtuseness that comes a as consequence of matrimony. For illustration when he writes â€Å"He married a adult female to halt her acquiring off now she’s at that place all day† demoing misogynous point of positi on on how adult females become raging after a piece or you can acquire bored of them. once more giving the sense that Larkin thinks adult females are merely utile for sexual relationships that aren’t excessively serious and don’t last long. He besides decides merely to advert the stereotyped raging traits of a married woman such as ; taking the husband’s money- â€Å"the money he gets for blowing his life on work she takes as her perk† and pecking the hubby to make jobs â€Å"put a prison guard in the wall. he has no clip at all† and eventually the inquiring for the female parent in jurisprudence to â€Å"come for summer. † These thing show how in this verse form Larkin is extremely colored towards the hubby and creates understanding for the adult male yet targets the married woman as being a user which I feel is misogynous and shows his hatred for matrimony. From the manner he writes about this hubby â€Å"Arnold. † being â€Å"less selfish than I. † shows us how he regards matrimony as being a ego forfeit and something he wouldn’t put himself through- â€Å"I’m a better manus at cognizing what I can stand. † As Larkin does non hold with the thought of matr imony he besides shows a negative sentiment towards kids in his poesy. In ‘Dockery and Son’ the character is chew overing on why Dockery would make up ones mind to hold a kid. the manner he words it â€Å"did he acquire this boy at 19. 20? † utilizing â€Å"get† as opposed to hold. demo how there is no fond regard at that place about as though a kid is merely an object. really much like how he appears to see adult females as objects with no existent fond regard. He so ends this line with â€Å"was he that withdrawn† which expresses how Larkin possibly thinks one needs to be withdrawn to do such a error. Larkin in the 5th stanza writes â€Å"why did he believe adding meant addition? To me it was dilution. † demoing how he is seeking to understand and come to footings with Dockery’s concluding behind his pick. â€Å"he must hold taken stock of what he wanted† as though a kid was an object to â€Å"stock† up on and that possibly this was Dockery’s concluding. The really fact that Larkin i s fascinated by Dockery’s pick to hold a kid and how he can non come to ground with why anyone would desire to hold a kid is grounds that in Larkin’s eyes it is a error ( like he feels about matrimony ) . Overall I think it is clear from the bulk of Larkin’s poesy that he isn’t fond of fond regard to anyone else and enjoys independency. Therefore he doesn’t see the ground for committedness of matrimony or kids. nevertheless the involvement he shows in other people’s want for kids in the verse form â€Å"Dockery and Son† suggest possibly he is still confused and is in fright – â€Å"life is first ennui. so fear† proposing he had a deadening childhood himself and now fears the alterations that holding a kid would do to his life. I think. although ab initio negative towards the thought of kids he is intrigued and deep down there is an component of uncertainty in his sentiment. Equally far as matrimony is concerned nevertheless I think there is no uncertainty he sees directly through the whole thought and see it as destroying the merriment of a relationship. We know from Larkin’s personal life of holding three important relationships with adult females in his life that he was non a woman hater. nevertheless in his verse form he does frequently include sexist comments and objectifies adult females.